Envío gratuíto en 48/72h a partir de 25€ de compra 
Sternberg (1986) hypothesized you to definitely components of love, given that counted because of the Sternberg (1997) Triangular Love Level (STLS), has more programs from the advancement away from relationships, with particular trajectories forecasting relationship achievements. That is, intimacy is expected to improve from the relationship, towards the potential to increase and fall for short periods out-of big date. In contrast, passions usually characterizes very early phases away from dating creativity, and may also evaporate over time otherwise produce opposite emotions-for example hatemitment was a description that takes stretched to help you arise in the partnership however, sometimes remain stable after it exists. Such malfunction had been corroborated because of the Wojciszke (2002). But not, Sternberg (1986) don’t establish empirical research so you can establish his theoretical standard.
All over numerous mix-sectionals analyses, Sternberg (1986) predictions discovered cousin help. Such as for example, Acker and you can Davis (1992) discovered that when you find yourself union was in fact higher having married couples, a fall from inside the interests over the years was only present in female people. An additional research, all the three STLS section was basically discovered to start during the lower levels in the beginning out-of relationships, after which increase over the years, with intimacy and you can union reaching large accounts despite short-title relationship (Yela, 1997). In addition, Yela (1997) found that, in contrast to Sternberg (1986) standards, welfare build reduced, maybe not achieving the exact same accounts since other proportions of like. Similarly, multiple studies have affirmed you to definitely higher very early dating partnership account impact for the higher enough time-identity partnership getting people whom stay-in their relationship, when you are first low partnership profile was of the relationship instability and you may dissolution (Dailey ainsi que al., 2013; Duemmler & Kobak, 2001).
Many studies eliminate relationship https://kissbrides.com/tr/asianfeels-inceleme/ updates while the digital, merging the various categories toward a couple of: “features a romantic lover” and you will “singles” (Adamczyk, 2017; Burchell & Ward, 2011)
Sure-enough, several training point to a strong family relations between like (and the constructs of which it is made) and relationships fulfillment (Cas; Hendrick & Hendrick, 1989; Keizer, 2014; Lemieux & Hale, 2000; Masuda, 2003). For example, Lemieux and you will Hale’s performs (Lemieux & Hale, 2000) demonstrated your STLS portion (i.elizabeth., passion, closeness, and you will partnership) is actually predictive of relationship pleasure. When you look at the men, STLS areas told me 73% of the complete difference inside the dating pleasure score, where partnership are a knowledgeable predictor, followed manageable by the welfare and you will closeness. In contrast, 87% of variability inside women’s dating satisfaction score was indeed predict by the the fresh new STLS-although buy of the constructs’ explanatory power was corrected, ranking intimacy, welfare, and you may partnership. Around the a beneficial metanalysis that have 81 studies, Graham ainsi que al. (2011) furthermore discover a robust, confident relationship anywhere between love and you will relationships satisfaction. Using STLS components to expect dating satisfaction into the matchmaking undergraduates, Madey and you may Rodgers (2009) stated that relationship and you may intimacy mediated the new family between secure attachment and you can matchmaking satisfaction, when you are interests are privately predictive off relationships pleasure.
Relationships Stages
Relationship position has been utilized inside the numerous studies. Unfortuitously, many of these training use their particular categorization out of relationships position. Such as for example, the fresh social networking Twitter allows the latest users to decide anywhere between 11 choices, plus “unmarried,” “for the a relationship,” “involved,” otherwise “married”, a network that was used in training (Orosz ainsi que al., 2015). Natividade ainsi que al. (2022) utilized the categories care about, filial, parental, close, and family to possess love, but a group studies recommended that just three groups (worry about, romantic/nearest and dearest, filial/parental) is outline the love dating. Dealing with relationship condition as a good categorical changeable will lose the key ability out-of outlining different phases about growth of dating.
Few research has utilized matchmaking status considering the individuals amount, although some exceptions exists. Including, Guerrero and you will Andersen (1994) used half dozen dating values: (1) maybe not relationship, (2) towards the a primary date, (3) dating casually, (4) dating surely, (5) marriage-bound, or (6) ) would be to manage half dozen degrees, based on the degrees of closeness, passion, and partnership: (1) dropping in love, (2) romantic beginning, (3) complete love, (4) companionate like, (5) empty love, and you can (6) dissolution. Other training (Lemieux & Hale, 2002; Yela, 1997) have browsed improvement in like and you will dating satisfaction around the relationship stages. In addition, inspite of the relationship anywhere between love and satisfaction, therefore the research evidence of stage-particular transform (otherwise trajectories) both in constructs (Karney & Bradbury, 1997), phase-specific interactions between love and you may dating fulfillment enjoys scarcely been searched.